VIII. Authorities Table
Statutes
| Citation | Subject |
|---|---|
| Cal. Code Civ. Proc. §§ 760.010–764.080 | Quiet title generally |
| Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 761.020 | Verification; required allegations |
| Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 405 et seq. | Lis pendens |
| Cal. Code Civ. Proc. §§ 872.210–874.323 | Partition |
| Cal. Code Civ. Proc. §§ 874.311–874.323 | Uniform Partition of Heirs Property Act |
| Cal. Civ. Code § 895 et seq. | Right to Repair Act (SB 800) |
| Cal. Civ. Code § 1946.2 | Just-cause termination (AB 1482) |
| Cal. Civ. Code § 1947.12 | Statewide rent cap (AB 1482) |
| Cal. Civ. Code § 4000 et seq. | Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act |
| Cal. Gov. Code § 7060 et seq. | Ellis Act |
| Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 425.16 | Anti-SLAPP |
| Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1941–1942 | Habitability obligations |
Cases
| Citation | Holding |
|---|---|
| Aas v. Superior Court (2000) 24 Cal.4th 627 | Economic-loss rule bars negligence claims for construction defects absent property damage or personal injury. |
| McMillin Albany LLC v. Superior Court (2018) 4 Cal.5th 241 | Right to Repair Act is the exclusive remedy for covered residential construction defects. |
| Hirshfield v. Schwartz (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 749 | Three-part balancing test for equitable easement in lieu of removal. |
| Gilardi v. Hallam (1981) 30 Cal.3d 317 | Tax-payment element is essential to adverse possession. |
| Mehdizadeh v. Mincer (1996) 46 Cal.App.4th 1296 | Modern restriction of agreed-boundaries doctrine; limits on prescriptive easement that approaches exclusive use. |
| Aaron v. Dunham (2006) 137 Cal.App.4th 1244 | Elements of prescriptive easement; no tax-payment requirement. |
| C&K Engineering Contractors v. Amber Steel Co. (1978) 23 Cal.3d 1 | Right to jury attaches to the legal "gist" of a mixed equitable/legal action. |
| Birschtein v. New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc. (2001) 92 Cal.App.4th 994 | Continuing-violation doctrine; analogically applied to prolonged habitability/harassment patterns. |
| Green v. Superior Court (1974) 10 Cal.3d 616 | Implied warranty of habitability as a defense to unlawful detainer. |
| Lamden v. La Jolla Shores Clubdominium Homeowners Assn. (1999) 21 Cal.4th 249 | Judicial deference to good-faith HOA board decisions within their authority. |
| Talega Maintenance Corp. v. Standard Pacific Corp. (2014) 225 Cal.App.4th 722 | Anti-SLAPP applied to HOA-board conduct. |
This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult qualified counsel for advice specific to your situation. Attorney advertising.
Evaluating a Real Property matter? Our attorneys are available for a confidential consultation.
Speak With an Attorney