Medical Negligence — California

Medical Malpractice in California.

Medical malpractice cases require substantive medical fluency on day one. We prosecute these claims in partnership with board-certified physician experts.

3 yr
MICRA Statute of Limitations
$400K
Non-Death Cap (2026)
$600K
Death Case Cap (2026)
90 d
Advance Notice Requirement

California Medical Malpractice Law


What This Means For You — Plain-Language Overview

If you or a loved one has been injured by a doctor, hospital, nurse, or other healthcare provider in California, the law treats your case very differently from an ordinary personal injury claim. Medical malpractice cases in California are governed by a special set of statutes — primarily the Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act, known as MICRA — that was enacted in 1975 and dramatically updated in 2022 by Assembly Bill 35.

Here are the practical takeaways every California patient should understand:

You have a tight deadline to file. In most cases, you have only one year from the date you discovered (or reasonably should have discovered) your injury, and never more than three years from the date the negligent act occurred. Children under six years old get more time. Missing this deadline almost always means losing the case — no matter how strong it is on the merits.

Before you sue, your lawyer must send a 90-day notice. California requires a written "Notice of Intent to Commence Action" to the healthcare provider at least 90 days before the lawsuit is filed.

Caps on pain-and-suffering damages were raised — significantly. For decades the cap was frozen at $250,000. Beginning January 1, 2023, the cap rose to $350,000 for non-death cases and $500,000 for wrongful-death cases, and it increases every year until 2033, when it reaches $750,000 (non-death) and $1 million (death). After 2033, it grows 2% per year. There are no caps on economic damages such as medical bills and lost wages.

Nursing-home and elder-abuse cases are different. California's Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act (EADACPA) provides enhanced remedies — including attorney's fees and pre-death pain-and-suffering damages — that MICRA does not allow. Pleading the right theory is critical.

Expert testimony is almost always required. California requires sworn expert testimony to establish what a competent provider should have done and how the breach caused the injury.

The detailed legal analysis below is written for attorneys and informed readers.



Recent Developments

Our annual reviews track the most significant legislative, regulatory, and judicial developments in California medical malpractice law.


Related Insights & Key Terms

The following doctrines analyzed in this memo are covered in depth in our Insights library.

Quarterly Legal Intelligence
Analysis, case updates, and legislative developments in Medical Malpractice — published by our attorneys each quarter.
Read Publications →

Need Medical Malpractice Counsel in California?

Contact us for a confidential consultation. We respond within one business day.

Free Consultation

This page is general legal information, not legal advice. Reading or contacting us does not create an attorney–client relationship. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.